Software, that great mass of code that lies between you and the cold, unthinking hardware. I advocate, quite vehemently, that software must be free, so this is where you'll find my open source and free software rants, as well as the random tirade. . .
|
|
Microsoft Needs to Keep Listening |
|
Written by Elijah Horton
|
|
Thursday, 28 June 2007 |
|
Face it, Microsoft gets a pretty raw deal at times when it comes to criticism. With the enviable revenue stream that Windows earns the Redmond giant comes the rather unenviable responsibility to keep 90% of the world's computers secure. It's a well known fact that Windows has improved its security situation, and that with a decent amount of security savvy and the proper settings, most Windows installs can stay virus-free for years. In spite of Microsoft's efforts, though, the ciriticism has not only lingered, but in recent months increased due to both the increasing value of Internet crime (which for the most part explot things entirely outside of Microsoft's controls, such as phishing) and the coverage that Mac OS X and Linux has garnered due to their better security situations (and somewhat more educated userbases). I would argue, however, that any true fan of Microsoft should thank the critics, because if anything, it has made the company take the security of its products much more seriously than in times past. If it wants to truly move past the its shortcomings, though, it should embrace the open source philosophy that places users ahead of business: otherwise, nothing will ever silence its critics. |
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 27 November 2007 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Elijah Horton
|
|
Monday, 25 June 2007 |
|
*NOTE* This article was originally posted May 1st, 2007, but in upgrading my website I haved moved it here. It exists for archival reasons only, and no comments from the original article remain.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Elijah Horton
|
|
Sunday, 24 June 2007 |
|
Like good people we all heartily defend the right for “innovators”
to enjoy the fruits of their labors, and earn back, with profit, the
time, effort, and resources they expended to bring about said
innovations. But something about our system of determining “innovation”
seems slightly. . .off.
Let’s take an easy example: Sir Tim
Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web and arguably
responsible for the most beneficial tool in all of modern history. The
idea itself is no longer as revolutionary as it once was (after all,
WWW 1.0 was rather plain compared to today’s “Web 2.0”) but without his
foundation, there would be no Google, eBay, Amazon, etc. Truly, if ever
a man deserved reward for his labor, Sir Tim does. And he has, for
knighthood aside, he has been granted several awards and countless
other accolades that add up to millions of dollars. Here’s the kicker,
though: how many trillions (yes, trillions) has his invention wrought
for others?
|
|
Last Updated ( Sunday, 24 June 2007 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|